Imagine Jack Buck's memorable call of Kirk Gibson's walk- off home run in the 1988 World Series to end with...but wait, let's check the replay. How about Bobby Thompson's memorable blast, or Hank Aaron's record breaker? I know none of these home-run's were close calls, but the fact that instant replay is rearing its ugly head into MLB could cause future moments to be a tad less special in history. IR is a complete injustice and, in my opinion, should be appealed and overturned. Once it is in, it will change the length of the game and the purity of the game. You see, they say it will only be for home runs but do they really expect us to believe this non-sense? It is only a matter of time when they will start using it for plays at the plate... 'traps' in the outfield...tags on stealing runners.. pick-off plays at first... balks... check swings... running in the baseline....etc... Then they will say that if the umpire is blocked on a certain play, they'll resort to instant replay. There are SO many things that IR can be used for in baseball (probably more than any sport around), and the day is coming where there will be too many plays it will be used for during a game that they deem as crucial in nature or plays of the game that are pivotal. Here is an idea: If they 'say' they only want to use IR for home-runs, then employ additional umpires for regular season games as they do for playoff and world series games. The cost for MLB to install IR cameras in each ball park, then hire the staff to manage the IR in the 'home office', not to mention all of the soft dollar costs that will be incurred by just managing the system. They would be hard pressed to say adding a few more umpires per game would be more expensive than installing IR in each ballpark in the majors. I am a purist. There is no room for this in the game today, and I hope that the powers that be would reconsider such an idea. Jeffrey Maier, where are you now??
Midway Point in the Season
12 years ago




